STANDARDS AND STANDOFFS IN SELF-DRIVING
This blog asn’t been active for about a week—why?—because most of the news in this space. Has not really changed. For a few days. Yesterday, however, a couple of developments started creeping. Toward. A turning point and so here’s a new entry.
STANDARDS
The trend in self-driving manugfacturing seems clear. Rule. 1 Hate Tesla Rule 2. Figure what your strength. Is including capitalization and find out who will merge with you to make. Your market entry. Bigger, better, and faster but not more inclusive. Merger with other car makers in general, but don’t worry about developing input channels from. Consumers because. If you get big enough people will have buy what you are selling anyway. Well this is just fine for some, however. People with disabilities and the elderly who could really. Benefit from reformed and improved transit options are slowly seeing the tail lights of their new hope disappear in the distance without car makers taking advantage of their knowledge even though. These folks have been using assistive technology. For lifetimes. So we will end up with big. Merged companies looking at access as an expensive afterthought again very soon. Here is where some government and industry. Standards. Might help (just saying) and save all taxpayers. Lots of money n the short run and of course the long run.
There is also a emerging trend that is sort of getting into the news in the self-driving. Arena: the introduction of robotic delivery. I read where Ford. Was considering. Building a robots to operate. Their self-driving car. To your house and then being able to get out and come to your door to deliver things like pizza. Okay now...I am one of the biggest. Supporters of self driving you will find,however we have to have a standard when it comes to uses for this stuff. Okay, it seems. Alright to have C3PO. Drop by with a double stuffed crust pepperoni with extra cheese on the surface. Yet let us think. About this. For a coupler minutes. Do we want engineers from some of our best schools. Like let’s say MIT really focusing on getting your extra valued meal to you in thirty minutes of perhaps they could be working on innovative recycling, maximizing renewable. Resources, and robotics that actually increase the functioning of human brings that. May need a new hand because as a fire fighter they burned one pulling you out of a fire? I actually wouldn’t. Mind seeing a few. People. During the day (if you want. I’ll send. You a list of people I’d rather not not see.)
Standardization
With the mergers in manufacturing there will come limited choices and a ushfor standardization across brands of autos. Nota bad. Thing in somer insytancrees. Here;where some advocates need to develop standards foraccerss and maker sure all car makers get these standardized accessfeaturesbuiltin during the design process. So as people with disabilities it is time we started to move. On this inside and outside government. Chanels. For. Example. There is no reason why all new cars should not bear driveableusing a joy stick. Thereino reason that all driver’s ed courses. Shouldn’t include the skills to monitor. Self-driving vehicles using. This joy stick, and there is no reason that all new catrs. Should not have at least two methodsofbreakingcontrol for safety purposes. One of these. Can be sensor driven if needed, however, there should be two.
Okay...that is enough for today. After all. We are just.getting cranked up again. Count on more updates when somethingof importance starts moving. For now remember the rules
- HateTersla
Have a great week...later.
No comments:
Post a Comment