Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Lies more lies and headlines In

LIES, MORE LIES & SELF-DRIVING CARS


When I was a kid….a tablet was something  Moses  had carried down from the  holy  mountain  to reveal the “new laws.”   In the  first dictionary I ever owned the definition for  computer was —noun—one who  computes.  

Yet today these words  carry with them  altogether  different  meanings and  my guess  is that if  I asked  a majority of  my children’s  generation to  provide a definition of these things they would not  even  come close to the cognitive  image I had earlier in life.
The  other  part of what I  would urge  us all to think about….. do  you remember for first cell/mobile phone?  Could  you shoot a movie with it?  Could you deposit a check into your bank account with it?  Could  you send a photo across the room with it?  I doubt  it.

So question one:   Why  are we so fixed on setting  a date when  self-driving  will be a thing, a real thing?  Have we even  really defined  what that means?  We have levels of  “autonomy”  set out so that  a reasonable conversation  can begin and that is a large step in the right  direction.  


Day after day  I read surveys  about how many people  do not  want self-driving  cars and wonder if  they have experienced any?—do they  know about the levels of autonomy?—or are they thinking  of a robot like the one in Lost in Space driving their  car around?  Do researchers  ask  if people like their current car as a part of the survey?  Or even if the person owns a car… I think these surveys  are sort of like asking  if you like  sandwiches?  Well some I do..some I don’t.  If you say do you like  sandwiches or pizza—then I am more likely to say  pizza, however, if you  asked  do you like veggie  pizza or a ham sands which  I’m saying ham sandwich  every  time.  

I’m not yelling at the researchers so much as the headliners… the  people who push the headline.  

Ok…I think you understand my point about  surveys regarding  self-driving.  Maybe there are  21% of the population who would still prefer  outdoor toilets…when is the last time we have asked?

Now let’s talk about  progress.  Some companies (in the most recent  round—Ford)  has  come out and said their  “self-driving”  cars will probably  not be ready as soon as they once thought.  Well  which of the following questions did this raise for you?

  1. Was Ford  lying to us when they make their first predictions?
  2. Has there been  some really  negative test results about their product?
  3. did  Ford already  lose the battle on this and is no3 slowing down?
  4. Well  my question would be did ford  finally decide to make access a bigger feature  so that people with disabilities  could use these  vehicles?  If that is true why aren’t  other companies  doing the same


What “progress” in other fields will  create  variations in the evolutionary  timeline of self-driving?  Will  printable circuits  on clothes change  the safety equations?  Will park and charge lot development  change the public’s acceptance?   Will making  these cars more accessible  to a person  with a disability encourage a very smart  young woman  to attend college and then engineer  the voice recognition  receptor  capable of  hearing the tone of someone yelling stop  at a sufficient  volume to stop the car from hitting  your  little boy who chases a ball into the street?  All this is possible and  given the speed at which technology  crosses the stream so to speak predictions to leaps forward, sideways, and even  at times  backwards  are all fairly likely.  

The best suggestion I have on this is  to stop predicting  the evolution of this technology and start working hard on the inclusion of variations so that work can begin on the expansion of capabilities.  Build  these  things like Lego so the parts  can be upgraded and modified….and keep including  a wide range of stakeholders—-you know  like anybody who needs to get anywhere, at any time.

Also take a look at the history of automobiles or televisions, or computers, or  types of shoes and realize evolution always includes  happy accidents and  unpredicted  failures.  

When someone announces a change in a timeline treat it like a scientist  needs a potty break not a massive  social commentary.  


I have a whole week scheduled  tp discuss  matters like this so enough  for today…

No comments:

Post a Comment